Feeling Gratified

It's been a crazy couple of weeks.  We've managed to finish all our academic studies for this school year, and we also attended our local Classical Conversations 3-Day Parent Practicum where the kids got to enjoy three crazy days in GeoDrawing camp while I attended general sessions in the morning and Essentials training in the afternoon.

Even though this was our third full year of homeschooling, it was our first year of official reporting since my son was in first grade.  At the end of the year, Georgia statutes require that I write up a summary of his academic studies and progress - and as I sat down to do that, I decided I'd like to give him a standardized test just to get an idea of how he's doing compared to other kids his age.  Christian Liberty Press offers the California Achievement Test (1970 version) online for $25, so that's what we did this afternoon.

It provides immediate results, and I'm feeling very gratified about my decision to homeschool after seeing these:

SUBJECT	Raw Score	Grade Equivalent	Percentile Rank	Stanine
Reading Vocabulary	85	2.9	82	7
Reading Comprehension	21	3.6	93	8
Mathematics Computation	40	3.4	97	9
Mathematics Concepts & Problems	43	3.4	90	8
Language Auding	14	5.5	98	9
Language Mechanics	28	3.0	83	7
Language Usage & Structure	18	5.1	95	8
Language Spelling	16	3.3	92	8

Explanation of the California Achievement Test Scores

Several different numbers are listed on your California Achievement Test results. Most of these are calculated based on a norm group (the original group of students tested on which the test is standardized). Results are listed by academic area. Below are basic definitions for these test scores.

Raw Scores
Raw scores are the actual number of correct answers within a given test section, and are used to calculate the Grade Equivalent, Percentile, and Stanine results. They should not be used for any kind of comparison or statistical calculation since each test section varies in the difficulty and number of questions.

Grade Equivalent Scores
Grade equivalent scores represent the grade level (year and month separated by a decimal point) of a student's ability compared to the median score of students at the same academic level.
Scores that are above a student's grade level do not by themselves indicate proficiency to skip to the next grade level in the particular academic areas. These scores more likely show an understanding of only some of the concepts of that higher grade. Conversely, scores below a student's grade level may indicate a gap of understanding in those academic areas. Scores equal to a student's grade level are considered the minimum for grade level ability.

Percentile Scores
Percentile scores are equivalent to the percentage of students from the norm group who received lower scores than the student. For example, a student with a percentile score of 73 means that the student did better than approximately 73% of the students in the norm group. Percentile scores do not represent the number of questions answered correctly.
Percentiles are useful for comparing a student's performance over several sections of the test. However, because they are not measured on an equal scale of units, they are not suitable for most statistical calculations.

Stanine Scores
Derived from the term STAndard score from a NINE-unit scale, stanines are based on the mean of the norm group (who are given the score of 5) and a standard deviation of 2.0. Scores are determined by the amount of standard deviation from the norm group, in approximately one-half standard deviation increments.
The following table lists the meaning of each score:

9 Highest Level	6 Slightly Above Average	3 Well Below Average
8 High Level	5 Average	2 Low Level
7 Well Above Average	4 Slightly Below Average	1 Lowest Level

Stanine scores are useful in calculating means, correlation coefficients, and other statistics which are meaningful to test evaluators.

My son has no previous experience with standardized tests, and he doesn't get any computer time per se so I sat with him while he did the test, but I tried my best not to prompt him at all.  I did have to explain that it's a timed test, so if he's not sure how to answer a question he should move on and come back to that one later; and also that if the answer he thinks is correct isn't one of the four offered, then he needs to select another answer.  Overall he did very well - I did find some weak spots (namely, he doesn't know the value of currency even though we did touch on that this year), and I think he would have done a little better if he'd paid more attention to detail - but I'm happy about these results overall.

At the risk of sounding like an intellectual snob, both  my husband and I are pretty intelligent people, and we both did well in school (and on standardized tests) so I knew the kids would likely be smart too - but it's still gratifying to have some hard evidence to back up my assumptions! 

Angst (repost from old blog)

I have tried this blogging thing before, but never with much success.  This time I'm going at it with a new attitude - it's a place for me to write about all the things that are important to me, not just homeschooling or geekery or any other single subject.  Anyhow, this is a repost of an entry I wrote last year on my old blog - it sums up how I feel about Classical Conversations, and perceived persecution of a sort from my local Catholic homeschool community.

I was going to write about our summer curriculum today, but I feel the need to get back to why I started this blog. I'm part of a local Catholic homeschool yahoo group; even though I haven't met many of the women on the boards, I get the posts in digest form in my email every day.  Even though I personally know at least seven Catholic families in our area who participate in Classical Conversations, the moderators of the board are convinced that the organization is somehow anti-Catholic and will not allow us to post announcements about CC or attend the local Catholic homeschool conference as a vendor.  (Seriously - we offered to pay for a table last year so we could present our materials to the Catholic community, and they flat out refused us saying they only permit Catholic or secular vendors.)

This is incredibly frustrating to me, as I love the Roman Catholic Church and I also love CC.  I completely understand wanting to support Catholic companies such as Classically Catholic and Catholic Schoolhouse, but the truth is that CC is a wonderful organization.  I have heard that, in some parts of the country, Catholic families have been made to feel unwelcome in CC communities, but that is not a mandate from CC corporate; Leigh Bortins herself states that she welcomes all orthodox Christians, including Roman Catholics and Greek Orthodox.

Classical Conversations does not teach religion. The company's motto is "To know God and make Him known," and that Christian spirit is evident in the communities - but there is no doctrinal teaching in the curriculum.  Instead, the focus is on teaching children using the classical method by focusing on history, geography, math, science, English grammar, and Latin.  There is Bible memorization - for Cycle 3, we memorized John 1:1-7 in English and Latin, and for Cycle 1, we memorized Exodus 20:1-17 (the Ten Commandments) - but there is no discussion of theology.  Even in the Challenge program, students are told that their parents are the spiritual head of the home and doctrinal questions should be discussed with them rather than decided by the tutor.

And yes, I know there is a timeline card that references the Reformation.  You know what?  That's something that really happened, and we need to discuss it with our children.  Maybe I have a different perspective on it because I was not born into a Catholic family - I began considering the Catholic faith when I was in college, and finally completed the RCIA process just six years ago when I was pregnant with Sophie - but I don't see a problem with discussing controversial topics with my children.  I can answer any questions they have with confidence and teach them how to answer their friends who may challenge them in a respectful and educated manner.

I suppose it comes down to this: I do not plan to raise my children in a Catholic bubble.  That is not why I chose to homeschool.  I feel called to homeschool because I truly believe I can provide my children with a significantly better education at home than they would get in a public school setting, and I also appreciate that they are being spared the relentless peer pressure that abounds even in private school settings.  I want my children to know there are other world views out there, and still understand the sacredness of our Catholic traditions.

I chose Classical Conversations after much research, and I stand by that decision.  I chose to become a part of a new CC community rather than starting up a Catholic Schoolhouse community or creating a Classically Catholic co-op because I have seen CC in action and I love it.  I do not believe that I am somehow violating my Catholic conscience by participating in CC.

I just wish I could make the leaders of the Yahoo group understand that.  Let Catholic families make the choice for themselves; talk to those of us in the local community who participate in CC, and don't just mandate that it's anti-Catholic and therefore should not be afforded the same privileges that Catholic and secular homeschool vendors receive